I was asked to give evidence to the House Of Lords' Committee on Climate Change and the Environment in March 2022. During the two-hour session I was struck by how eager the members were to listen to me and my fellow experts and sometimes surprised.
Peers were seeking to understand how behaviour change from the public can have a role in achieving the Government’s net-zero goals. Their questions led to a lively discussion about what works and what doesn’t. For me it was also a chance to press home the need for a public information campaign as I've called for on numerous occasions.
According to the Government’s own Climate Change Committee (CCC) nearly two thirds (62 per cent) of the Government’s proposals will require the public to alter their behaviour.
That’s a big shift. But the consensus from those of us giving evidence was that this is indeed possible because citizens wants to do something to tackle climate change. However action depends on access to impartial, factual information and swift, effective action from politicians and businesses.
As my fellow witness Trewin Restorick, Chief Executive of environment charity Hubbub, said: “We are operating in a sea of confusion among citizens. They have no idea what is going on.”
I argued: “The public is ready, we are pushing at an open door, and things such as insulation and the national retrofit scheme will not work unless the public know the benefits because there is a level of disruption and cost. We need that public information campaign with clear targets and number one has to be insulation because we are in a cost-of-living crisis.”
Committee Chair Baroness Parminter asked if businesses were facilitating changes to meet environmental goals because they were responding to consumer demand, had seen a marketing opportunity or were being persuaded by Government.
Professor Peattie pointed out spending on sustainable food and household products doubled between 2010 and 2020. He said “A large chunk of that is consumer led.”
Trewin Restorik, mentioned the “Attenborough effect” on the public using less plastic and companies having to catch up.
But he added that as a campaigner: “You feel like you are a brave soul fighting against the stream because government is not on your side, and when you look at the scale of the climate impact, you think, “Why are you not helping? Why are you not enabling society to see that we are on an unsustainable path?” I could list initiative after initiative that consecutive Governments have started; they have started to work, and then they have gone. I can see no desire in central government to truly make this happen.” This rang so true to me and no doubt anyone who has been working away and often disparing at decisions taken by Government ministers.
Then the actual Duke Of Wellington asked about the impact of shifts in behaviour on low-income families. He gave the example of reducing the number of flights people take.
He said: “It is the aspiration of many families, whatever their income level, to have a foreign holiday once a year. That is quite a natural thing that people want to do. Are you going to put a higher tax on aeroplane flights?”
Witness Professor Ken Peattie, an expert in marketing and strategy at Cardiff Business School, argued: “People do enjoy foreign holidays but we should think of it this way: if you had a friend who you knew was financially living beyond their means to a point where they were facing disaster, you would be asking them to cut back on their expenditure.”
I added that 50 per cent of people in the UK take no flights and 15 per cent take 70 per cent of all flights. If you fly first class to Australia you are emitting an average person’s annual carbon footprint. And the effects of rising temperatures impact lower income households more severely, for example if you live in a flood risk area with no insurance and no friends with big homes who can house you while you repair your own home.
I was delighted when Lord Lucas asked: “Could we subsidise Which? and One Home to give a really effective and easy source of information as to exactly how providers of products were responding?”
Obviously, as a not-for profit social enterprise, I would love government to part-fund One Home because a public information campaign will require significant resources to ensure the reach and duration are sufficient to enable the changes required in the next ten years throughout the UK.
Lord Browne of Ladyton asked about scale and suggested talking further with One Home because of how many people we reach.
I argued that we need to make going green desirable and normal. “A great example of that is the Greggs’ vegan sausage roll, if you give people the opportunity, they will buy it and make that shift. It is about making it normal, and the only way that can really be delivered is by the Government setting the framework, then businesses delivering it to the consumer.’
We covered so many subjects; the role of taxation, flooding, energy-efficient housing, working from home, the cost of oat milk, mortgages, wind farms, lobbying from vested interests, the circular economy, the failure of the green home grant, travel infrastructure and even the positioning of eco products in supermarkets.
Witnesses Paul Ellis, Chief Executive of the Ecology Building Society and Hugo Spowers, Founder of zero emission car company Riversimple, also made excellent points.
Lord Bishop of Oxford called our evidence: “Really helpful and inspiring” and Baroness Parminter summed up the meeting as “a fascinating session”.
I certainly came away thinking the committee was pleased to hear we felt the public is ready to act. It was a privilege to be invited to Parliament and I felt a real buzz after the session that change could happen. Let’s hope our collective evidence will help the Committee press home the importance of impartial information in changing public behaviour to reach net zero emissions.
You can watch the session here and I hope that you enjoy it as much as I did taking part: https://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/e1ea19b3-5ef4-4034-a586-f9f06e92349a
Today I learned what it’s like to be at the centre of a Twitter storm.
“do gooders like Angela Terry believe it is her right to put sanctions in place for everyone else!”
“not all there are you really?”
“you have to be kidding..”
And frankly, much ruder comments I’m not going to repeat here.
The Great British Public are on it. They know we are racing towards climate catastrophe, but they need to know how to help pull on the brakes.
How do they cut through the noise and learn how to adapt to extreme weather that threatens homes and children’s futures? How do they learn which small lifestyle tweaks add up to meaningful change?
Count Us In is a community of people and organisations taking practical steps to protect what they love from climate change before it is too late.
My organization, One Home is a Count Us In founding partner and I am really excited about what we can achieve together.
A heatwave in October is unusual in the UK. A heatwave followed by an ex-hurricane and dangerous winds is bizarre. Yet that is the weather forecast for the weekend. Weird weather has become the norm. It makes for great conversations, photos and headlines but climate change is no laughing matter.
On the 18th of July 2017 a four-foot wall of water rushed through the tourist village of Coverack wrecking homes and businesses, just at the start of the crucial holiday season. Film footage showing an elderly couple rescued from their home by a helicopter was beamed around the world and was reminiscent of similar pictures taken at Boscastle when a flash flood destroyed their village in Cornwall.
The campaign slogan for International Women’s Day was Be Bold for Change and no bigger change is needed than to stop climate change: because no one wins in a warming world.
Women have always been at the forefront of the environmental movement. They may not always have high-profile roles but in terms of action, women are consistently the ones who turn out, volunteer, and make the difference.
Lists of gadgets pop-up frequently highlighting the best headphones, speakers and cameras. But how about buying gadgets that do good rather than just add to the clutter?
There are now a fantastic range of gadgets that are not only useful but cool, trendy and crucially benefit the Planet:
Trump does not believe in Global Warming. Yet, for the first time ever there is global consensus that urgent action is needed to stop burning fossil fuels. Even oil exporting countries like Saudi Arabia have signed the Paris Agreement… thus Trump’s position is entirely ridiculous and women, in particular, have the option to show the way forward.
Statistics tell us that people want to support clean energy and local food. Yet they remain a drop in the ocean in their contribution. Food and energy are key components of our lives and two of the rare commodities we are guaranteed to utilise on a daily basis.